AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. Azure Site Recovery


Organizations use backup solutions to address critical issues that arise, including server failures, manual errors, or disasters that strike unexpectedly. Consequently, data backup and recovery are vital to the efficient management of an organization.

The use of additional drives or an external server to store enormous amounts of data enables successful data protection systems. Without implementing these systems, data recovery becomes a challenge and, in the worst case, leads to information loss and major business risks.

With this in mind, businesses should consider the best data recovery companies for their data protection and recovery solutions.

Here’s everything you need to know about how AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and Azure Site Recovery, two leaders in the disaster recovery market, compare:

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. Azure Site Recovery: Portfolio

Organizations can save tremendous costs by eliminating idle resources at recovery sites and only paying for full disaster recovery sites when needed. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery (AWS Elastic DR) reduces data loss and downtime by quickly and reliably recovering cloud-based and on-premises applications using minimal compute, achievable disk space, and point-in-time recovery.

It even gives organizations immense flexibility in their elastic recovery site as the replication servers can be attached or detached as needed. Its core infrastructure is designed to meet the security needs of global banks, the military, and other highly sensitive organizations and industries.

With AWS Elastic DR, organizations can get their apps in minutes, regardless of whether the status is current or historical. Security is backed by a suite of more than 300 security compliance and governance features and services. AWS adheres to 98 security standards with all compliance certifications. Its 117 AWS services that contain customer data provide the ability to encrypt data tightly.

On the other hand, Azure Site Recovery is cost-effective, easy to deploy and reliable, ensuring business continuity despite planned or unplanned critical IT outages. Azure aims to seamlessly run business apps with its site recovery in such cases.

Adopting a BCDR (Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery) is important for businesses to keep their data safe. Azure helps organizations with site recovery by replicating workloads running on VMs (virtual machines) and physical machines regardless of location. In other words, if an outage occurs at a secondary site, the organization can switch to a primary site and access applications from there.

Also Read :  Why Choose a NoSQL Database? There Are Many Great Reasons

All in all, Azure keeps important data recoverable, safe and secure with its backup service.

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Azure Site Recovery
Broad
depth
specialization
In total

AWS Elastic disaster recovery vs Azure Site Recovery: Partners

AWS Elastic DR offers countless possibilities partner who are involved in almost every field. AWS has brilliant partner histories in many industries including manufacturing, healthcare, general government, transportation and logistics, media and entertainment, software and internet, aerospace, energy and utilities, retail, financial services, and consumer staples.

Some AWS partners who have won successful leads include DXC Technology, which has enhanced the customer experience with AWS cloud-based call centers. Others are MRG Gas, Franklin Planner, TAG, ChaosSearch, Gett, Capgemini and many more.

In comparison, Azure Site Recovery includes a variety of partner around the world. These include Heartland Business Systems, Silicon Networks, Icube Consultancy Services, Gig Werks, IT Partner (Office 365 and Azure Solutions), Aldridge, Computer Solutions East, OnPar Technologies, Vistas Cloud, Streamsets and more.

Azure also offers flexible services for a range of industries, including agriculture, education, financial services, government, healthcare, hospitality, employment, transportation, and manufacturing.

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Azure Site Recovery
Broad
depth
specialization
Global Reach
In total

AWS Elastic disaster recovery vs. Azure Site Recovery: use cases

AWS Elastic DRs use cases include various services. Businesses can quickly recover their entire operations from unforeseen events such as hardware failures in the data center or software problems. On-premises to AWS enables RTOs (Recovery Time Objectives) of minutes and RPOs (Recovery Point Objectives) of seconds.

AWS even helps increase resiliency and meet all standard enterprise requirements. By using AWS as a recovery site, organizations are creating space for AWS to transform their cloud-based applications to run natively and seamlessly on AWS. In addition, AWS increases app resiliency and helps meet accessibility goals for AWS-based apps. With AWS Elastic DR, companies can recover apps in a completely different AWS region.

Compared to AWS, Azure has a long list of use cases. With site recovery, organizations can set up and manage replication and set up region-to-region disaster recovery. Additionally, organizations can replicate VMware VMs to Azure; local VMs to Azure; or any workload running on supported Azure VMs, including on-premises HyperV and physical Windows and Linux servers. These replications will lower the cost of running a secondary data center.

Apart from that, Azure Site Recovery offers several other services. These include application consistency through failover, non-disruptive testing, data resiliency, customized recovery plans, and flexible failover.

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Azure Site Recovery
Broad
depth
specialization
In total

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs Azure Site Recovery: User Reviews

Corresponding G2, AWS Elastic DR secures a 4.5-star rating out of 5 with a genuine review list of people recommending the same. Out of TrustRadius, AWS scores 8.5 out of 10, along with excellent reviews and ratings. in the capterraUsers rated AWS Elastic DR 4.6 stars out of 5.

Some users consider it as a platform for all data solutions. This reduces the investment costs for companies. However, users also feel that AWS can improve its technical support for customer support.

Azure Site Recovery also has a 4.5 out of 5 star rating compared to AWS G2, along with notable reviews. Out of TrustRadiusAzure secures an 8.6 out of 10 with exciting reviews. And onwards capterraAzure garnered a 4.6 star rating out of 5 with a fairly appreciative review list.

According to users, Azure Site Recovery services are easy to use and great for small to medium sized businesses. It can be configured according to business workloads. Another significant advantage is the increase in application speed. Some users feel that more features could have been included in the Azure Site Recovery solutions and could also come up with flexible pricing plans.

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Azure Site Recovery
G2 4.5 out of 5 4.5 out of 5
TrustRadius 8.5 out of 10 8.6 out of 10
capterra 4.6 out of 5 4.6 out of 5
In total

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. Azure Site Recovery: Industry Recognition

AWS Elastic DR leverages the most comprehensive, reliable, and secure global cloud infrastructure. In terms of recognition, Gartner Research places AWS in the Leaders quadrant of the brand new 2021 Magic Quadrant for CIPS (Cloud Infrastructure & Platform Services).

As referred to in this Magic Quadrant, CIPS are defined as standardized, superior automated offerings in which integrated platform services complement infrastructure (compute, storage and network) resources. Millions of customers, including high-profile enterprises, fastest-growing startups, and leading government agencies, all use AWS to reduce costs, become more agile, and innovate faster.

Azure Site Recovery provides another level of recognition. From business analytics to DevOps and IoT, organizations can leverage scalable and cost-effective economic solutions that align well with their current investments.

Azure is expanding its services in diverse areas such as financial services, healthcare, government, retail, and manufacturing. Several companies have expressed their appreciation, including ASOS, DAIMLER and McKesson.

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Azure Site Recovery
volume
diversity
meaning
In total

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. Azure Site Recovery: Overall

AWS Elastic DR is the most dynamic community with millions upon millions of active clients and customers worldwide. It has over 200 fully-functional services and has provided outstanding solutions to over a million businesses. In addition, AWS has provided excellent cloud services to many customers for more than 16 years.

On the contrary, Azure Site Recovery is highly dedicated to backing up large enterprise data. Azure has been in the market for decades, recovering unlimited data and offering over 90 compliance offerings, making it the largest portfolio in the industry. Azure strives for customer satisfaction. Speaking of trust, more than 95% of Fortune 500 companies rely on Azure and trust it to run their business.

AWS Elastic DR and Azure Site Recovery empower businesses with data recovery solutions, helping them maximize their growth and performance. Based on your business needs, you can choose services from any of these companies as both hold strong positions in the market and offer the best products and services.

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Azure Site Recovery
portfolio
partner
use cases
reviews
recognition
In total



Source link

Also Read :  Guide To Optimize Cost While Considering AWS Cloud Services